|
From e-mail I'm only a mechanical engineer and only semi-literate with computers therefore I haven't used the on-line grammar check methods. Instead, I've used IGA (Intuitive Grammar Analysis) or if you like I've listened to the rhythm of the words. These tell me that one person ( older, less educated, probably a bit blustery) wrote the basic document. This was polished by a more educated person, probably with experience of personnel management, and who was preparing the note to support the case for dismissal. I then beleive it had a cursory look from someone with a legalistic background although probably not a solicitor. Examples of the older chap are para 1 , the waffle
about the evening appointment in para 9 Examples of the personnel person are para 3,4 ... probably 60% of text. Examples of the legal phrasing are para 3 'liabilities for l[icense] &c[opyright] infringements' , para 10 without prejudice basis', para 11 'right of appeal ...negotiations to his appeal' , and para 16 'prejudiced by the non-disclosure'. So there you go, a mixture of styles. The first guys notes were probably too tatty to show outside so someone tidied them up and then asked a mate with limited legal experience to cast an eye over the text. Pretty obvious really. Tabulated Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
and the bit about computer
snobbery in the last sentences. 
